Osamah
I am building my first gaming pc and I have come up with 2 possible builds. The problem is, I don't know which one is better. Also, if you find any errors (compatibility issues, etc.) please let me know. These are parts I found on amazon:
Build 1: Intel
--------------------------------------â¦
Case: CM Storm Scout 2 Advanced - Gaming Mid Tower Computer Case
Motherboard: MSI Computer Corp. DDR3 1600 Intel LGA 1155 Motherboards - Z77A-G45
Processor: Intel Core i5-3570K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570K
Graphics Card: MSI GTX 660 Ti Power Edition Graphics Card with Triple Overvoltage and Enhanced PWM Design (N660TI PE 2GD5/OC)
Solid-State Drive: Intel 330 Series Solid-State Drive 180 GB SATA 6 Gb/s 2.5-Inch - SSDSC2CT180A3K5
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 3 TB HDD SATA 6 Gb/s NCQ 64MB Cache 7200 RPM 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive ST3000DM001
RAM 32GB: Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3 1600 MHz (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory - CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10
Fans: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition Twin Pack Fan (CO-9050002-WW)
Power Supply: Corsair Gaming Series 700-Watt ATX/EPS Bronze ATX12V/EPS12V 696 Power Supply GS700
OR
Build 2: AMD
--------------------------------------â¦
Case: CM Storm Scout 2 Advanced - Gaming Mid Tower Computer Case
Motherboard: GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD7 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX
Processor: AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Graphics Card: MSI Computer Corp. Video Graphics Card N770 LIGHTNING
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 3 TB HDD SATA 6 Gb/s NCQ 64MB Cache 7200 RPM 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive ST3000DM001
RAM 32GB: Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3 1600 MHz (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory - CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10
Fans: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition Twin Pack Fan (CO-9050002-WW)
Power Supply: Corsair Gaming Series 700-Watt ATX/EPS Bronze ATX12V/EPS12V 696 Power Supply GS700
Thanks in advance.
By the way I also do video editing on my computer.
Answer
Computer #2 is the winner for gaming.
Overall the Core i5 3570K is the more powerful CPU, but that really isn't a factor because both CPUs are strong enough for high-end gaming- neither will be a bottleneck for high-end graphics cards. And it's the graphics card that's most important in gaming builds. In most titles roughly 70% of your in-game fps are determined by your GPU model, not your CPU. And that's where there's a huge disparity- the GTX 770 is even better than the GTX 680!
For video editing it's about a wash- the FX-8350 has more cores which is very beneficial for editing software like Sony Vegas, but the i5 3570K has stronger per-core performance and Intel's quick sync feature which greatly improves transcoding. Anyway they trade off- in some editing tasks the FX--8350 wins, in others the i5 3570K wins. Both are capable, arguably a slight edge to the Core i5. But on the gaming side it's a mismatch because of the GPUs.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2013/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-770-2gb-review/5
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_770/16.html
Computer #2 is the winner for gaming.
Overall the Core i5 3570K is the more powerful CPU, but that really isn't a factor because both CPUs are strong enough for high-end gaming- neither will be a bottleneck for high-end graphics cards. And it's the graphics card that's most important in gaming builds. In most titles roughly 70% of your in-game fps are determined by your GPU model, not your CPU. And that's where there's a huge disparity- the GTX 770 is even better than the GTX 680!
For video editing it's about a wash- the FX-8350 has more cores which is very beneficial for editing software like Sony Vegas, but the i5 3570K has stronger per-core performance and Intel's quick sync feature which greatly improves transcoding. Anyway they trade off- in some editing tasks the FX--8350 wins, in others the i5 3570K wins. Both are capable, arguably a slight edge to the Core i5. But on the gaming side it's a mismatch because of the GPUs.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2013/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-770-2gb-review/5
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_770/16.html
Is My Graphics Card Bad (2013)?
Jess
I have a Fujitsu laptop that's almost 2 years old. I can't play many online video games that I would like to (such as Tera), and even the ones I can play lag horribly unless I have the graphics on the lowest settings. I want to know If I should give up hope on this laptop and save for a new one, or if I can maybe fix it... With something else? o-o
Added Note: I can run Tera, but it must be on the lowest graphic settings and it still lags a bit with that.
My card is: Intel(r) graphics media accelerator HD
Memory size for the card is 1722MB
Specification is: Intel(R) Core i5 CPU M 480 @ 2.67GHz
Please and thank you ^^
Answer
Thomas Edison has a better graphics card than you buddy. Your best bet is saving up for a nice new gaming PC. Go about 600 dollars on it, and I promise you, you can play any game on Low-Med graphics. Newegg.com bro.
Thomas Edison has a better graphics card than you buddy. Your best bet is saving up for a nice new gaming PC. Go about 600 dollars on it, and I promise you, you can play any game on Low-Med graphics. Newegg.com bro.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Which Gaming PC Build is Better?
Rating: 95% based on 99438 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 95% based on 99438 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment